Supervisão em psicologia clínica e da saúde: modelo cognitivo comportamental

Abstract

Objectives: To identify, characterize and compare the process of cognitive-behavioral supervision in Clinical Psychology and Health Psychology, under the perspective of supervisors and supervisees. Methodology: Sixty individuals, 30 supervisors and 30 supervisees, randomly chosen, participated in the study. Data were collected in accredited institutions, which maintained the Cognitive-Behavioral model as a training. Protocols for collection were: Data of Sociodemographic Identification, Training and Experiences of the Participants; Questionnaire Pereira & Valerio on the Supervision Process and Questionnaire on the Trainee and Supervisor Versions, adapted from the Questionnaire of Deadlock in the Psychotherapy Supervision of Nigam, Camerom and Leverette, by Oliveira et al., for the Brazilian population. Data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative information was grouped according to categories of answers schematized by interdependent judges, with a Concordance Index equal to or greater than 75% among them. For the quantitative variables, descriptive statistics were used by frequency, percentage, mean, median and standard deviation, considering the dispersion of the phenomena studied. Results: The participants' ages ranged from 31 to 61 years for supervisors and from 23 to 42 for supervisees. For all the groups, female sex and catholic religion were predominant; married civil status was pointed out by supervisors and the single one by supervisees. São José do Rio Preto, SP was referred as the city of origin, home at present and local of formation by the majority of the respondents. The training time ranged from one to 36 years, and supervision was from one to 33 years, the longer time pointed out by the groups of supervisors and the shorter by the supervisees group. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and health psychology are the basic models of action and Lato-Sensu specialization courses more mentioned by both groups; Master and Doctorate degrees most indicated by the supervisors. For the supervision process, data showed high scores in all domains, in the Pereira & Valerio instrument. However, Ethics and Teaching predominated with higher percentages among all groups, while Assistance, Management and Research varied among them, with the lowest performances. Analysis of the factors investigated by the instrument of Oliveira et al. have pointed out to the Improvement of Learning as the most marked by most groups, and Understanding, with the worst results. Conclusion: Socio-demographic data and aspects of supervision are according to the related literature as well as expected for this population and will allow the drawing of projects and programs for the qualified development of the supervision process.